‘Geography and destiny are tightly interconnected” and “modern humanity is a drama whose scene still being reconstructed” are two powerfull sentences written by Blij which I believe can introduce perfectly this model. In the first sentence, the author clarifies the power that the place of birth has in the quality of people living conditions. Being born in the global core (being a global)  or in the periphery ( being a local) creates not only a difference between peoples’ cultural heritage, educational level, or wealth; but also relies an important aspect of the power of action that a small portion of individuals or group of people have over themselves and the fast-growing majority of locals who occupy the rest of the planet. The global and local dichotomy is not only seen in a planetarium level, this fractal phenomenon is also perceived in a national scale where the cities contain all the privileges of modernity,  while the rural area, in contrast, brings marginalization, perishing, and poverty. This sharp contrast of two worlds carries the consequences of mobility. The mobals are the personification of the risky dreamers.  They move to global areas hoping to gain autonomy, social mobility, and stability. This tension due to an uneven distribution of resources around the globe generates a social drama in which mobals step out of their comfort zone crossing the patrol barriers of the globals. This struggle or “the revival of apartheid methodology” is creating a fragmented world. Many locals want to pass through the other side of the border; however, immigration policies, xenophobic public speeches,  fear of interculturalism still contained potential mobals to make reality the wishes of a more fair distribution of global resources. The author clarifies that the future of the human population relies on the relationship between these two opposite bands.