Hello. I hope your dog is doing fine. I also would like to apologize if I was overemotional in any of my replies. Coming back to the topic, God’s morality evidently depends on God’s will. Despite this, God’s morality is objective, since God and his attributes, including his moral judgements, are eternal and hence unchangeable. Furthermore, God’s morality is intimately related to God’s nature. God does not choose to be good; rather, He is goodness itself. You may say that a morality that depends on the opinion of a being is necessarily subjective. However, it seems to me that this line of reasoning would inevitably lead you to conclude that all morality is subjective, since morality does not exist outside the minds of moral beings. In other words, if there are no moral beings, what sense does morality make? If morality cannot exist outside the mind of a moral being, what is the closest thing to an objective morality that we can find? The most straightforward answer is that the closest thing to an objective morality would be the moral judgement of an eternal, unchangeable, and inerrant being, who, in addition, can neither profit nor be harmed by the actions of mortal beings. Well, God is this unchangeable, eternal and inerrant being. No other being fits this description better than God. By the way, morality cannot be treated as if it were a natural law because there is no objective reason to believe that a living creature is superior in any objective sense to an inanimate object. I am sure you could enumerate thousands of reasons why a living creature is superior to an inanimate (i.e., dead) object. However, not one of these reasons will be objective in nature.