It would be absolutely incorrect to agree with this statement framed as such.
Since the person was born, he or she is endowed with certain rights common to all citizens of a state
and guaranteed by the state constitution. Thus, all people have common basic rights, which is
supposed to not lead to the conflict of rights.
In this case, it would be more appropriate to talk about personal space. Human beings are social,
and whether the person wants to or not, his personal space almost always intersects with the
personal space of other individuals, and everyone has to accept this. People are obliged to study in
the society of other students and use public transport suffering from stepping on each other's toes –
those are the most vivid examples of daily intersections of personal spaces. And even if some
students are taught by personal tutors and use own cars – anyway the personal spaces overlap, and
mutual influence occurs. The personal teacher and student affect each other, and the driver is
obliged to share the road with the same drivers and stuck in the same traffic together. Therefore,
almost the whole life experience of the person is based on the intersections of personal rights and
spaces. In order to be able to exercise own rights without violating the rights of other people, it is
necessary and sufficient to make it a habit of interacting with people correctly. Compliance with one
of the fundamental rules of the right human interaction goes as follows: do as you would be done
by. Most people know it, but very few adhere to it. Realizing this rule, both parties will get satisfied,
and the rights of them will be fully ensured.
To sum up, it is impossible to avoid the intersection of personal rights living in society, but in most
cases, it does not imply the termination of someone’s rights.